Your Government at Work

Rob wrote in a recent comment he wishes to learn more about Public Choice Theory. I don't think I'll be able to provide a better example of PCT at work than this:

Via Cafe Hayek, ABCNews reports:

On page 432 of the Reid bill, there is a section increasing federal Medicaid subsidies for “certain states recovering from a major disaster.”

The section spends two pages defining which “states” would qualify, saying, among other things, that it would be states that “during the preceding 7 fiscal years” have been declared a “major disaster area.”


I am told the section applies to exactly one state: Louisiana, the home of moderate Democrat Mary Landrieu, who has been playing hard to get on the health care bill.


In other words, the bill spends two pages describing would could be written with a single word: Louisiana. (This may also help explain why the bill is long.)

Senator Harry Reid, who drafted the bill, cannot pass it without the support of Louisiana’s Mary Landrieu.

How much does it cost? According to the Congressional Budget Office: $100 million.

(Emphasis mine)

In the real world, we would call something like this a bribe. But I guess because Reid is doing it with other people's money, as opposed to his own, it doesn't fit the precise definition of "bribe." Just business as usual in Washington, D.C.

And this racket is what Matt Yglesias thinks will improve health care.

Despicable.

(Kudos to ABCNews for bringing this to light. No doubt there are many other "provisions" like this that need to be identified and brought into public view)

2 comments:

  1. I don't think it counts as a bribe if it is your job to bring home the bacon to your constituants. That is, after all, what we elect representatives to do for us; They protect our interests. While Will might not choose to support a candidate who can pull in pork, many Americans are voting on precisely that. That's the trouble with a republic.

    But, yes textbook horse trading and a good example of public choice theory in action.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Please consult Article I of the Constitution and tell me how any of this (health care overhaul) is constitutional. If it's not (and I don't see how it is), in my eyes Reid's move is a bribe, plain and simple.

    I understand representatives are supposed to protect our interests, but I think you make my point in illustrating how inefficient and unfair the system is when government gets involved in what should be handled by markets.

    ReplyDelete